Client's Choice Awards 2017
Colorado Criminal Defense Bar
Avvo Rating badge
Denver Bar Association
Client's Choice 2014
The American Trial Lawyers Association
American Bar Association
Colorado Bar Association

Understanding the Stages of a Criminal Trial

Exploring the Standard Procedures of Criminal Trials in the United States

The Law Office of Monte J. Robbins, Esq., with a rich appreciation for America's common law traditions, offers a detailed guide through the intricate landscape of the criminal trial process. These procedures, shaped by centuries of legal practice, create a consistent framework across state and federal courts. Below is an overview of the typical sequence of events in a criminal trial, from inception to conclusion:

Choice of Adjudication: Defendant’s Privilege
The defendant possesses the right to select trial by a judge (bench trial) or by a jury. Contrarily, the prosecution is not entitled to demand a jury trial.

Jury Selection: The Voir Dire Process
In cases warranting a jury trial, both defense and prosecution partake in a rigorous jury selection process, known as "voir dire." This involves extensive questioning to ensure an impartial panel. In many jurisdictions, judges facilitate this with input from attorneys.

Pre-Trial Motions: In Limine Hearings
Before the trial commences, both parties may file motions "in limine" to determine the admissibility of certain pieces of evidence.

Initial Case Presentation: Opening Statements
Each side presents opening statements to the judge or jury, providing an overview of the case they intend to substantiate, setting the stage without overpromising on the deliverables. Defense counsel may defer their opening until the defense's presentation of the case.

The Prosecution’s Burden: Case-in-Chief
The prosecution introduces its principal arguments through the direct questioning of witnesses.

The Defense’s Examination: Cross-Examination Phase
The defense is given the opportunity to cross-examine the prosecution's witnesses.

Prosecution’s Follow-Up: Redirect Examination
Thereafter, the prosecution may conduct a redirect examination of their witnesses.

Completion of Prosecution’s Presentation: Prosecution Rests
The prosecution concludes its argumentation phase.

Defense's Argument for Dismissal: Motion to Dismiss (Optional)
The defense might request a dismissal if they believe the prosecution's evidence is insufficient to convict.

Oft-Rejected Dismissal: Denial of Motion to Dismiss
Typically, the judge dismisses the motion to dismiss, progressing the trial forward.

Defense’s Narrative: Case-in-Chief
The defense then articulates its primary arguments through direct examination of their witnesses.

Prosecution’s Counter: Cross-Examination
The prosecutor cross-examines the defense's witnesses.

Defense’s Clarification: Redirect Examination
The defense may further elucidate their case through the re-examination of their witnesses.

Defense’s Conclusion: Defense Rests
The defense rests, signaling the end of their case presentation.

Prosecution’s Counterpoint: Rebuttal
The prosecution offers additional evidence contravening the defense's assertions.

Finalizing Guidelines: Jury Instructions
Both parties collaborate with the judge to devise the final instructions that the judge will present to the jury.

Prosecution’s Summary: Closing Argument
The prosecution delivers its closing argument, underscoring the evidence and advocating for a verdict of guilt.

Defense’s Summary: Closing Argument
The defense delivers its closing argument, reviewing the evidence from its perspective to persuade the jury towards a not guilty decision or a conviction on lesser charges.

Prosecution’s Final Words: Rebuttal
The prosecution is granted the final opportunity to influence the jury, reinforcing their position for a guilty verdict.

Judge’s Direction: Jury Instructions
The judge instructs the jury regarding relevant laws and delineates their responsibilities. Some judges issue these instructions before closing arguments or at the trial's commencement.

Jury’s Decision-Making: Deliberations
The jury then deliberates towards a verdict, striving for a unanimous decision, although some states offer exceptions.

Defense's Post-Verdict Moves: Post-Trial Motions
Subsequent to a guilty verdict, the defense may file post-trial motions, either for an acquittal or for a retrial.

Judicial Confirmation: Denial of Post-Trial Motions
These motions are predominantly denied by the presiding judge.

Final Judgment: Sentencing
Assuming a guilty verdict, the judge either determines the sentence immediately or schedules a separate sentencing hearing.

For any questions or if you need legal representation during any phase of a criminal trial, do not hesitate to reach The Law Office of Monte J. Robbins, Esq., at 303-355-5148. We are committed to providing our clients with a vigorous defense and ensuring their rights are fully protected throughout the judicial process.

Client Reviews
"An excellent lawyer choice for my son who was charged with driving while his license was revoked. DMV had mistakenly sent (3) letters of revocation to the incorrect address, so I hired Monty to prove that my son never knew his license was revoked. Monty kept me informed at all times as to what was happening and what he doing to prove my son's innocence in this matter. We were to appear in court on 29 March 2012 and Monte informed us on 27 March 2012, that the case had been dismissed!!! Monte charged a fair, flat rate for what he did in this matter and should the need arise to hire a lawyer or to recommend a lawyer, I would not hesitate to give Monte's name.” Linda
"I consulted three other attorneys on my traffic offense in Colorado and none of them thought I could beat it. Then I consulted with Monte Robbins. He not only relieved my warrant without my presence in Colorado, but he got my habitual driving offense reduced to an infraction. I was up against the wall on this case but thanks to Monte miracles are possible. I have hired my share of attorneys and Monte Robbins has produced the best results for me yet. After being without my driving privileges for ten years I paid a small fine and am legal with a clean record. I Highly recommend this attorney." Steve
"I hired Monte J. Robbins to represent me. He gave 110% to my case never rushed me off the phone, quick to gather all information regarding my case. Monte is very knowledgeable and helped me out a lot. He kept me informed every step of the way through my case. I was always able to get a hold of him for any questions i had. The outcome of my case was way better then i had expected. Monte did a excellent job on my case and I would highly recommend him to anyone. Monte won my case and I am confident that he can do the same for anyone else." Jeremy